Subscribe to daily environment news





 

Click for news Click for pictures
National Tree Day

Planet Ark Home


FACTBOX - What is the Kyoto protocol?
Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version

MOROCCO: October 29, 2001


MARRAKESH, Morocco - Environment ministers from around the world meet in Marrakesh, Morocco, today for two weeks of negotiations to finalise the rules on the Kyoto Protocol on climate change.


Here are some frequently asked questions about the pact.

WHAT IS THE KYOTO PROTOCOL?

It is a pact agreed on by governments at a United Nations conference in Kyoto, Japan 1997 to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by developed countries by 5.2 percent of 1990 levels during the five-year period 2008-2012. Eighty-four countries have signed the pact and 40 of have ratified it, according to U.N. data. Only one country which has an emissions target, Romania, has ratified to date.

IS IT THE FIRST AGREEMENT OF ITS KIND?

Governments originally agreed to tackle climate change at the "Earth Summit" in Rio in 1992. At that meeting, leaders created the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) which set a non-binding goal of stabilising emissions at 1990 levels by 2000. Although the convention has more than 160 participants, it is widely considered to have failed to halt a global increase in emissions.

The Kyoto Protocol is the follow-up to that and is the first legally binding global agreement to cut greenhouse gases.

SO IT'S LEGALLY BINDING?

It is binding once it has been ratified (approved at government or parliament level) by 55 percent of the signatories representing 55 percent of developed countries' carbon dioxide emissions.

HOW WILL IT BE ENFORCED?

Under a deal made by environment ministers in Bonn, Germany, in July, if countries emit more gases than allowed under their targets at the end of 2012, they will be required to make the cuts, and 30 percent more, in the second commitment period which is due to start in 2013. Ministers rejected the idea of having a financial penalty. Compliance will be overseen by a special committee.

DOES EVERY COUNTRY HAVE TO REDUCE EMISSIONS BY 5.2 PERCENT?

No, only 39 countries - relatively developed ones - have target levels for the first five-year commitment period, adhering to the principle established under the UNFCCC that richer countries should take the lead. Each country negotiated slightly different targets, with the United States aiming for a seven percent reduction, Russia for stabilisation at 1990 levels and Australia allowed an eight percent increase. The 15 European Union countries took an eight percent cut and then later shared out the effort differently among member states.

WHAT ARE THESE "GREENHOUSE GASES"

Greenhouse gases are gases that trap heat in the earth's atmosphere. The main one is carbon dioxide (CO2), most of which comes from burning fuel. The protocol also covers methane (CH4), much of which comes from agriculture and waste dumps, and nitrous oxide (N2O), mostly a result of fertiliser use. Three industrial gases used in various applications, such as refrigerants, heat conductors and insulators, are also included - they are hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6). One group of greenhouse gases not included is chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), previously used in aerosols and refrigeration, because these have been banned by a separate treaty aimed at protecting the ozone layer.

SO EACH COUNTRY HAS TO REDUCE ITS EMISSIONS BY THAT AMOUNT BY THE 2008-2012 PERIOD? WHAT IF IT CAN'T?

The protocol provides for "flexible mechanisms" - ways for countries to reach their targets without actually reducing emissions at home. These include emissions trading - where one country buys the right to emit from another country which has already reduced its emissions sufficiently and has "spare" emissions reductions.

Another is the "clean development mechanism" where developed countries can earn credits to offset against their targets by funding clean technologies, such as solar power, in poorer countries. Countries can also claim credits for planting trees that soak up CO2 - so-called carbon "sinks".

SO IF A COUNTRY EXPLOITED THE FLEXIBLE MECHANISMS IT COULD AVOID REDUCTING ITS OWN EMISSIONS COMPLETELY?

In theory no. In Bonn, countries agreed that the mecha


REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

Reuters



© 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.
top

 
TODAY'S
ENVIRONMENT
NEWS

AUSTRALIA:
Climate Change Threatens Australian Fisheries

CHINA:
Beijing City Raises Pump Prices to Fund Cleaner Fuel

CHINA:
China Grim on Prospects for Climate Pact

CHINA:
Shanghai Highrises Could Worsen Rising Seas Threat

CHINA:
Strong Quake Rattles Tibet

FRANCE/BELGIUM:
EU Snubs Industry Plea for US$54 Bln for Greener Cars

INTERNATIONAL:
FACTBOX - Habitat Loss, Hunting Put Mammals at Risk

KYRGYZSTAN:
Central Asia Quake Kills 72, Razes Village

POLAND:
Poland Close to Blocking Minority on CO2 - Officials

SPAIN:
All Firms Urged to Appoint Green Expert to Board

SPAIN:
One in Four Mammals Risks Extinction - Study

UK:
Breeding Seen Key in Greener Farming Revolution

UK:
UN Body to Finalise Action on Ship Emissions

UK/BELGIUM:
EU Vote Weighs Carbon Trading Riches

UK/SPAIN:
Risks Mount for Global Warming Fight - UN



previous day


This site developed by Frontline, and managed by Planet Ark using RPM-NT.

Site designed by Jon Dee @ Planet Ark.

Radiant