Subscribe to daily environment news





 

Click for news Click for pictures
National Tree Day

Planet Ark Home


LA babies get lifetime's toxic air in 2 weeks - study
Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version

USA: September 17, 2002


LOS ANGELES - A two-week-old baby in the Los Angeles area has already been exposed to more toxic air pollution than the U.S. government deems acceptable as a cancer risk over a lifetime, according to a report yesterday by an environmental campaign group.


The study of air pollution in California by the National Environmental Trust also said that even if a young child moved away from California, or if the air had been cleaned up by the time he or she reached adulthood, "the potential (cancer) risk that a child rapidly accumulates in California from simply breathing will not go away."

California, known to be the nation's smoggiest state, already has a potential cancer risk to adults that is hundreds of times above levels seen as acceptable by the Environmental Protection Agency.

But the report said children were more vulnerable to pollutants than adults because, pound for pound, they breathe more air, drink more water, eat more food and play outdoors more than adults.

"A baby born in California will be exposed to such high levels of toxic air contaminants that the child will exceed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) lifetime acceptable exposure level for cancer at a very early age, and will exceed the lifetime acceptable exposure level by many multiples by age 18," the Washington D.C-based environmental campaign group said.

The "Toxic Beginnings" study divided California into five geographical areas. It concluded that in Los Angeles an infant would have reached the EPA's one chance in one million limit of contracting cancer from contaminants in 12 days, and in Sacramento it would take 23 days.

It said diesel exhaust - from trucks and cars, school buses, and farm and construction equipment - was still the worst source of air pollution. But it also took into account chemicals emitted by dry cleaners and factories as well as pesticides, adhesives and lubricant oils.

The National Environmental Trust urged federal and state policy makers to make cleaning up the air a priority.

"The overwhelming policy implication of these findings can be reduced to one word: URGENCY", it said.

It recommended that regional and local governments emphasize alternative technologies and fuels, replace diesel school buses and other municipal vehicles with cleaner alternative fuel models and enforce existing laws on fuel emissions.


REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

Reuters



© 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.
top

 
TODAY'S
ENVIRONMENT
NEWS

ARGENTINA:
Rains Bring Some Relief to Drought-Hit Argentina

AUSTRALIA:
Australia Economy Can Afford Emissions Trading - Expert

AUSTRALIA:
Australia Climate Adviser: Scheme Need Not Boost CPI

AUSTRALIA:
Australia Climate Plan Must Be Realistic - Adviser

BELGIUM:
Battle Over EU Car Emissions Takes Greener Path

BELGIUM:
France Proposes Phasing in CO2 Curbs for Cars

BRAZIL:
Brazil Government Biggest Illegal Logger in Amazon

GERMANY:
Hamburg Allows Vattenfall to Build Coal-Fired Plant

GERMANY:
Financial Crisis Could Hinder Climate Talks - Germany

ITALY:
Hunger Fight Must Protect Animals Too - Campaigners

MEXICO:
Pollution Slowly Killing World's Coral Reefs

NORWAY:
Ocean "Dead Zones" Spread, Fish More at Risk - Study

PHILIPPINES:
Philippines Removing Toxins From Sunken Ferry

POLAND:
EU Urged to Agree on Climate Before UN Talks Open

SUDAN:
Thousands Flooded by Sudan Dam Closure - Villagers

UK:
Study Eases Fear About Wind Farm Threat to Birds

UK:
People Near Nuke Plants Don't Mind New Ones - Study



previous day


This site developed by Frontline, and managed by Planet Ark using RPM-NT.

Site designed by Jon Dee @ Planet Ark.

Radiant