Demand for base metals from China and India has pushed
prices to record high levels over the last few years, making
offshore mining, despite huge challenges, look economically
viable. Mining firm Nautilus Minerals is exploring high
grade copper, zinc and gold deposits in the waters outside Papua
New Guinea, while Neptune Minerals has prospecting
licenses outside New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Micronesia.
Nautilus has said its startup has been delayed three-to-six
months after the collapse of a plan to have a vessel to ship the
ore to shore built by Belgian dredging firm Jan de Nul.
"We have been building these things for 20 years," Noel
Pille, director of the offshore department of Jan de Nul, said.
"Now they (Nautilus) will build it for the first time...I
don't think they realise the details," he said.
He added that the rock Nautilus must cut into demanded some
special equipment, which was viewed as being too expensive.
Nautilus's share price has been hard hit since the
cancellation, down 40 percent to trade at 142.5 pence (US$2.89)
per share as the project has lost time. But the company says it
is still going ahead.
"We are saying that production could start in 2010 instead
of the end of 2009," chief executive David Heydon at Nautilus
said.
"The costs will change -- capital and operating costs -- all
of that will come out by mid-October," he added.
THREE MONTHS DELAY
In New Zealand, severe weather has caused a three months
setback of the exploration schedule for Neptune.
"We are three months behind because of bad weather that
destroyed our equipment," CEO Simon McDonald said.
Equipment failure on the remote-operated vehicle used for
sampling mineralisation delayed the assessment and definition of
the mining zone until September, he said.
The firm's share price on London's Alternative Investment
Market has risen to 36 pence, up by 12.5 percent since June.
TRIBAL OPPOSITION
Another problem the firms face is opposition from tribal
communities living close to the exploration sites and some
environmental experts are concerned about the impacts from
seabed mining on the flora and fauna in the deep seas.
In Papua New Guinea, the Bagabag Community Development
Association is concerned about environmental disturbance and
damage, including water pollution, the group said in an email.
"As islanders, we depend for our entire livelihood for sea
protein," the group's spokesman Paul Daing said.
Neptune targets inactive seafloor massive sulphide (SMS)
deposits and these sulphide deposits support aquatic life, Cindy
van Dover, Director of the Duke Marine Laboratory at Duke
University in the United States.
"Until it can be demonstrated that there is no major loss of
diversity or ecosystem service resulting from mining activities,
the decision to permit commercial mining should be postponed,"
van Dover said in an email.
Both of the mining projects are located within territorial
waters of the countries which have issued the prospecting
licences. As a result, local laws, and not international
conventions, apply.
"Nautilus appears to have been very responsible...but they
really have only done environmental work just over the area
where they want to mine," said Paul Tyler, Professor of Deepsea
Biology at the University of Southampton in Britain.
Tyler said the dispersion of material could cause severe
damage to flora and fauna in the area around the mining site.
Assistant Professor at the Department of Geology Jochen
Halfar at the University of Toronto said if the first seabed
mining project was successful more were likelty to follow.
"Governments needs to get together to formulate a code of
environmental regulations in order to guide the industry," he
said.